No. 23-5135
Leonardo Burgos-Valencia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process judicial-procedure ninth-circuit right-to-be-heard standing substantial-rights summary-affirmance
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court's summary affirmance violated petitioner's right to be heard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT’S SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE . VIOLATED PETITIONER BURGOS-VALENCAYS RIGHT TO BE HEARD? . I WHETER THE DISPARITY IN COMPARISON TO OTHER CASES VIOLATES PETITIONER BURGOS-VALENCIA’S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS? ; ;
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent