No. 23-5152

Angel Maldonado v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2023-07-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure curative-instruction ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions pennsylvania-supreme-court reasonable-doubt state-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred in denying a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to jury instructions

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED i 1. Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred when it denied Petitioner’s request for a new trial based on trial counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to object to the trial court’s deficient ‘reasonable doubt instruction’? (Answered in the negative by the state court). 2. Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred when it denied Petitioner’s argument that ; trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the trial court’s improper ‘curative ; instruction’ regarding the testimony of witness Jennifer Patrick? , (Answered in the negative by the State Court). : ; { ' | . l \ \ i 1 \ : i \ . .

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-27
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2023-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Angel Maldonado
Angel Maldonado — Petitioner
Angel Maldonado — Petitioner
Pennsylvania
Nancy WinkelmanDistrict Attorney's Office, Respondent
Nancy WinkelmanDistrict Attorney's Office, Respondent