No. 23-5175

In Re Gregory Albert Darst

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure administrative-procedures appellate-dismissal civil-procedure docket-manipulation judicial-immunity mandamus procedural-due-process recusal standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Clerk Smith or staff attorney dismiss appeal 22-10918 without involvement of judicial officers?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. :

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Darst, In Re Gregory
Gregory Albert Darst — Petitioner
Gregory Albert Darst — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent