No. 23-5177
Kenneth Ragan-Armstrong v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court due-process judicial-discretion plain-error procedural-reasonableness sentencing sentencing-conditions supervised-release
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court plainly erred in imposing special conditions of supervision without explaining why such conditions were necessary or appropriate in Mr. Ragan-Armstrong's case?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question Presented Whether the district court plainly erred in imposing special conditions of supervision without explaining why such conditions were necessary or appropriate in Mr. Ragan-Armstrong’s case? i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent