Arnes Becirovic v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims
question presented is deemed to comprise every subsidiary question fairly included therein. Only the questions set out in the petition, or fairly included therein, will be considered by the Court. Is Certiorari granted?Ru le 14 content on a Petition for a writ of certiorari good Another key factor is national importance. A petition is more likely to be granted if it can demonstrate that the decision below affects a large number of non-parties, a substantial portion of the economy, or a particular group of individuals the law traditionally seeks to protect (e.g., veterans). A primary indicator of an issue’s | importance is whether it regularly recurs. w/in 45 days from entry of the order noting probable jurisdiction [or postponing consideration of jurisdiction] We granted certiorari, 387 U.S.(2019), and now affirm. Other issues raised by the Government and amicus are not addressed here because they were not considered by the Fifth Circuit. Pp. 4-6. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal circuit is vacated as moot. See United States v. Munsin wear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950). : A reference to the opinions below(Rule 14.1 (a) : (d) Citations of the official and unofficial reports of the opinions and orders-entered in the case by courts or administrative agencies. : (United states court of appeals for the federal circuit Justia docket) . re Becirovic (United states courtof appeals for the federal circuit pacer monitor) x (United states court of appeals for the federal circuit UNI court link) : 4. : ase/2022-1353 (O portal unified patents) | i A concise statement of the grounds on which jurisdiction is invoked (Rule 14.1 e) (e) A concise statement of the basis for jurisdiction in this Court, showing: ¢ (i) the date the judgment or order sought to be reviewed was entered (and, if applicable, a statementthat the petition is filed under this Court's Rule 11); ; -Petition for a writ of certiorari (United states supreme court)-The above-entitled petition for a writ of certiorari was originally postmarked June 30, 2022 and received again on February 15,2023. -Rule 17. Procedure in an original action ° ‘ « (ii) the date of any order respecting rehearing, and the date and terms of any order granting an extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari; l : ¢ -The above entitled petition for a writ of certiorari was originally postmarked June 30, 2022 and ; received again on February 15,2023. ; . : e (iii) express reliance on Rule 12.5, when a cross petition for a writ of certiorari is filed under that Rule, and the date of docketing of the petition for a writ of certiorari in connection with which the : cross petition is filed; e (iv) the statutory provision believed to confer on this Court jurisdiction to reviewon a writ of certiorari the judgment or order in question; and e (v) If applicable, a statement that the notifications required by Rule 29.4(b) or (c) have been made. e (b) In any proceeding in this Court in which the constitutionality of an Act of Congress is drawn into question, and neither the United States nor any federal department, office, agency, officer, or employee is a party, the initial document filed in this Court shall recite that 28 U.S. C. §2403(a) may apply and shall be served on the Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5616, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001. In such a proceeding from any court of the United States, as defined by 28 U. S. C. §451, the initial document also shall state whether that court, pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §2403(a), certified to the Attorney General the fact that the constitutionality of an Act of Congress was drawn into question. See Rule 14.1(e)(v). . \ ¢ (c) Inany proceeding in this Court in which the constitutionality of any statute of a State is drawn ! into question, and neither the State nor any agency, officer, or employee thereof is a