Whether a state court can remove children from a parent's custody based solely on hearsay evidence prohibited by state statute and in the absence of jurisdiction

Questions Presented “™ (elore he Court is a mathe Vavel ving UN abusek ahilel en trahicked into Roster eare by Kearse , Cousin itrepatrable hatw The mother Sutlered expected emotianal istess aS result. Tk Defendants then sed rhat istesS to cette ackively \astity \ntial removal, refusal to reunity | and derminadion 6 the Camily's ra hssy in absence of all qensdiction . Stard to finish Anis Cases glese children deserve your Sime, ) Can a Anal court open and remove children in a protective Custedy" G@ase based Solely On hear soy CLCUBOALEOAS pro hibitsed by State Sratale in Secret andin absence of jurisdiction? | 2) Can a Sriel court threaten a distressed Moaker with Curler dlecreased Qontact wiah her ahildren to Coerse an “agreement before ee eet ee Xho* agree mente into , an admission of quilts ro Child a use | Realect without Qacks Be evidence. of ahd abuse/ ncglect iA thet agree Trent OF elSe bere? 3) Can Delendants create systennic barrrers 4o elCecd ius Counsel, deny a. Family Oppotturityy of mance teck Celloguey reoiew S, acd appeal On isSues, Suckoas abuse of process, — Qursdretion | Craud Upon the Gout, abuse of discretion and jadicial misconduct +o fore a ral Jer nninadtian, oh garenial rrghts On a family deprived of ve Gundam: Cnsalhy Paic OPpottunitry do litigote she facts ab a Cour record Caccuracy of Sranscripts , orders, ewidence, and findings 7, 4) Can @ Stale Court of last resort declare, & raul Shandar a of review of evi dence, AA aiNSE a GlesS of people with °Tsp/ depression Gellouding the. rer troval af her Children to « prependarancd of — buidence.”” ter diagnosis is, in and of sel “\eopardy 40 children when the Supreme Court of. the. Oni ted. S4aks hens long. demanded a State relrein Cham Presumption that a Glass of people an on@it parents (Stanley v Lhnos, 4S OS, GIS, 686-S% ca7y \ and reguireS “Clear and Conuincivg. —eutdanc]e et ab use. | reatect ( Stantesky vi Kramer, YSSUS. 248, . 068-91 (gay 2 a 5) Can Sete, Coure of lesa resore deny appeal 5 | ancl attempss of 2 Water's redress of He tel Court abuses, aka echo adkese abuses fo adleclare a Motke Aoes pot legally have Rights to hen Children, ak is on prior. . +0 ghee termin-~ @ion of her parental nan Po. Sy O ca Lise ot Parties Kinley MeeDorald , Pecirroner, Marker, Pre Se . Clo Nord Court Sail ~~ S Athredl, ME. 04003, ' AGH SSB oor Obl of Kinkey Meconalel Cg MIME Tice chit of Binley (MecDoreta DEE (GME Mier ehild of Kinley MeDoretd, Daniel “Sohnson “Qadher!! of en ‘ Goh Precce Coad \ Phenix City, AL 36g90 \ Prue ile, “ Qeathe rt? ot ch , Roger Chompagne a. VS Cres cence Se . . Biddeford, ME 0400S “Sudges" of YorK County, MEE | Michael Duddy, Low Ann Sutton, Robert Mulhern, Sedge Sohn Doe t . : WRidleford, Qiearick Court : RyddeGord ME o400> © Dade or Magistrate. Sa, “Soseph County Pro dete Ce. Sudae Seha’ Dee a. . 1000 S. Michigan St , A hoe Ra South Rend, TV 4bGa1 “Sidiges" H& Supreme Sadicial Cours Me Sudge “Sohn Qoe3, Sade Cacurnce : BOS Newbury Sr Rm 134 . Pocg lan dh PIE ontotUrey | PRoreey © eral, Bssistene Ak ley Gecerals, Aacon Frey, AG, Marla PWallisey-Swtlt AAG, Maura Yea verey ARG , AAG Sar does i-S 6 Srate Howse Sration Augusta, ME 04333-0006 Deore of Wealth and Auman Seruteces (pans or aps) “Sean, Lambrews, Nelly SoAnre, Peardohtl, TeraLynn Preard, Megon Thomas, esse Cummtres, OWS Sare Does l-lS By Atterrey Gereral ss office. G Strate House Sration Augusra, ME 64333-006 , Governor” Sante Mills . Alo Stare Se Y Releted Categ™ State ok “Srdiana Soknson Vv. DSeknson, Marri oge et Mary Sohnson, (Rintey MeDorid) v., Daniel Sohnsen, Marron oanty, TIN Cem MMM Si. Soseph County, SNZe LJ (EC. —Soseph County, ZN , Shete, ot Maine In Re Ag SEEM, PO-21-01 | Sn Re Cg ond Wa (\ SR Qc 21-02 Tra Ge. Children of Rinkey Mm. No. Cum 323-324 Pedrtron Cor Dedlarets we “SD udige mant, No. Cum-22°32/) Supreme “Sudicial Course, ME ~ 816-22 Denred Skabe UV. Kinley MecDoneld, YRROD-CR-20-GoS22 Disate® Cour , MacDomed v Duddy et al, No. 3:22 -ayO0na3 SAu/ US. Di