Does the inclusion of a fifth element of the justification defense for being a felon in possession of a firearm, requiring the Defendant to prove that he 'did not maintain the illegal conduct any longer than absolutely necessary,' violate the precedents of this Court?

Question Presented Does the inclusion of an fifth element of the justification defense for being a felon in possession of a firearm, requiring the Defendant to prove that he “did not maintain the illegal conduct any longer than absolutely necessary,” violate the precedents of this Court?