No. 23-5192

Phiet The Doan v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-07-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process equal-protection excessive-fine fourteenth-amendment jury-trial restitution sixth-amendment victim-restitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Mr. Doan have a Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a jury trial on whether he owed almost $64,000 in victim restitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did Mr. Doan have a Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a jury trial on whether he owed almost $64,000 in victim restitution? 2. Did the restitution award of almost $64,000 constitute an excessive fine or violated due process or the equal protection clause? -i

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Phiet Doan
Jonathan GrossmanSixth District Appellate Prog., Petitioner
Jonathan GrossmanSixth District Appellate Prog., Petitioner
State of California
Christen Elise SomervilleCalifornia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Christen Elise SomervilleCalifornia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent