Whether the district court erred in denying the petitioner's motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 5 , « f e e an the. £2) LF thal LAA ptr rt e _ i fe VY DALAL. athe ) Ma Ld) TVAllE DL ¢'07 AL QLCL LM ah ils hd TL a1 Q Al FEL LOMT2 TE. ThE. dD ua LST he tLe Mas tf) Disa J Ug _| CNUTTEZA LOT). FECAL FTLANELTLLY J Al] THE C2CLLLTA a 122 wile ¢ * yt. ty / WIRE Ll aS ita aUBlLWULTE Pf £1 FiIa Aa TREY Zan intel ry aut fia? 7e | ot taking te Z La nd? Ue | 2 have. tt __| | | £ Delta Unit | Legal Use Only i ce a CLE, j > on ; ? 5 x trial Said an the. Stand That they. Lalit (eeithty re 25 the blatk ran on te Video, Then He _ Hat they PNaléd 2 Le /iaidal, V ALoZl Ll fi Nal a floyd ANB Nf KhALLIia Adaf? dO fihq Ltt 18 Ltt ig Gg Nh CVC E pp A _(aha Ti , TCO L2 fave! tlelased/ 21(tt2A Ol fly BAUME PALIN 6, LAN Cy attetne VY trey Hl Jie and Left Be july Knol that EL have nevet been allestad, tr ThE pening STAtTeMeE/tS, then The Tthel Coct¢ Lave . Onittla wid Ay Tal Hansci pp g Crt LIC _ p LA le dal , | : . | Delta Unit ; Legal Use Only. — -alteadySetling a 30 thitly geal Sentence FA _ , Clark Courtty and I Uli anly do tee yeaté on | SERENE Lan TL have_my incomplete frial trantoripp ; —Covipated ta tip Mia Sealand abd placeedsgg — , | 3 of | .