Was the petitioner unlawfully detained?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 3 Was t unlaw Fully detained when k was placed in teshtalads by police, | Gnd £ was unable fo leave: intimidated by the display of gecicsal authority! J And OY whak PINE during He Police questioning did it become an cnterto akan . . . * goto » Poet me construton torbid enstitubion yf Crivioal conyich . Victions 9¢ on tamous’ Magnamity only on tn FoRMation aud, No & , : ; ; Rand fury, Ludicharent 2 + Ean there be ‘effective! assistunee of counsel whele de fendant ) . tS to Plocess (ights are teducesh to wRitten tnt etlogatories wd MPulsor'y . ano Not wt) Gan OMe law Fully donsent to a searda of AVOICLS winibe we meee mete b ej . « with so much availab\e RLU Patow, evidence ot pvese ed "S detained 2 . Mee i ‘yt ooundaries of advotacy tm the law of gency 7 © tounsd within the « Can @& tonvicrion of a Capital atFense be austained wnele it yesk: . an . FES on Ane law of Parties and the vidime tnyuriy at a ee ie © nok Patent mn regard 4p Fakeality 2 Does Mert C1ess aisle gard permet ORtminal R ecosncih ity ‘ . Ponsibil: H OF parties tw Texas 4 4Y OF anotg under Hoe lar 4 Lan Fquital\e tolling be agglied to te AL. DPA. Live, Vimutetion when tac {etd AEAIY Makiyaly Supports dnuse @ donadeving tne totality vt diteumetanees and the tetorcl as a Whole an Wak ot New Evidence is potitionel’s Capttal Conviction Law ful 9 . Wid trial Counsel Fail ty atbseck Yne ploseampy s tse ty meceningt ( adyeronol Testing when it Fail t donot a law entoreement foovernnerness on an out OF tort stab 2 , Can portions’ evel aduell tonccenee with Ae Erulpatel, Endler de outta ot trie