No. 23-5211

Andrew Cook v. Robert Martin, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abstention amendment-protections civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process executive-power executive-powers general-warrants judicial-abstention younger-doctrine
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether there are issues of Constitutional importance regarding the 4th, 6th, 8th and 14th Amendments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether there are issues of Constitutional importance regarding . the 4th, 6th, 8th and 14th Amendments in case at bar That Are of im-portance to All U.S.citizens?Are we back to the days of English General warrants,are executive powers going unchecked as was orig“inal intent of the forementioned protections ?Aretexecutive order-s"that nullify a criminal defendants constitutional rights acceps -table? 2) And,whether abstention under Younger waS appropriate being that conflicting rulings are pertinant to Petitioners issues in other Courts of appeal and law of the land cases that indicate Appell-ant Has made a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right.--Appellants Brief from USCA attached in

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent Martin, Warden to respond filed.
2023-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 25, 2023)

Attorneys

Andrew Cook
Andrew Cook — Petitioner
Andrew Cook — Petitioner
Martin, Warden
Michael Joseph ProtoOffice of the Chief State's Attorney, Respondent
Michael Joseph ProtoOffice of the Chief State's Attorney, Respondent