Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying petitioner's motion for rehearing en banc, which sought review of the district court's denial of petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment based on newly discovered evidence

No question identified. : laeepron faesenmen i FE Oo FOAL (ULE Of o | oid Cave PLoce | herttog: . PCEMURE LO (byC | MTOR ETE LES CSLEEr Feo SWwoaemens Base a) | DIS COVERED EUZOENCE . SED on NEWLY | THE Qué sreOx) Par SENTED TNS CD up 7 Hor praca Meee Exoure Cnécurr Lypey . o L GS) EN SAQURRE Conferer WE Deore REO way UAT Anvp OF OME? Coors — EOS OF THE s . 7 TR WE Maren ConsTenees A PeetDemcsy Seunn , Yo Ruse bo (b) | Hagens Perreren AS A maree. or baat O€ SUC ssruE Pe. . . I i | | | | | | a) hoo LiSf OF PRETIES \ La Detndra Ste PAIL | Eel Dette Payre, | \ | | | | | | ' -GQueéstzen) Feesenveo -TASLE OF Aurtoermes e OPTINTONS BELOW ? o JUCS-SOTCTESA! : r [ “Smiturwmey Paovrsrovs Taoveo * STATENENT OF CASE : ' o Fl0RRAL Bute oe Ces Pevccousee Ge Pensonis oe. ARAN TING “THE WET... | ED) THe Granny Czecer HeLw Tat Peres ee? duce feo (b)Q@) Mormn Fs 9 Pectmexreds Seton oe. SuceSoszvel HABEAS Avpercarre.) | Con Fixer, WE OfLergny by WE | Cm2eierts Ow AN Wesuce THAT MAS THE DD. Vex | Essen: , pee, . OMEN EAC Ty COxSE | Ta ESSENTIALLY AMY ESsiLe THOT thas THe Q | 1 Ore . io arse FN Feseqrza; VENTE iam A | SSE ALLY Aw y Hagens CASE. |, ECXSz OA; CoN Plrers ve Com ciusepa) | | : | Appenoxy _ { . ~ TU Gurr Cary | ooce DOM ENG Keener fuer o@ Aer ead s OEE OQANTE ANG Cpare | 4 EXCATE Oe APPLE ALA Brim i | 7) Bekenn ve UNMErey Sores , O74 ©. od TED 77 CATH Esp 1 $4): , os 7 Bae INT'L Coe? Ve, ETL. Yyacre COUN SEL LTD. | $17 F.3d i IDTV) ALIS CUT" xe. 2evg) | 1 CAWELON Ve. —THpmeson , OF US.6 19s bY) (993 U.S S3e ) Comets vs. Atror) 9.8. Co. , Cos F. 24 Au, 102 4 exe (1474) } ) Coss Ms. CACKAW BWANA Cum , M4, $32 WS, Bqy Qvei) , 2eu C34 53 uu Cea Fz000) Ey Banc 7 Dawe V's. aie Faew Frew CAS Aero TENS. Co, 443 FF 2 ub ag TH Cre. 1443 NDwewtron Am. lic vs. ZaAcal TVA mG, »EM., 257 £ 34 bl Wee Cr exe. 2015) °) a Vs. Cteysiee UbS ©. 24 Igo, ify 4.3 (T ecg yan (Fee ; ) fSacee Caome + Evecs.) Trac, vs. ( Mom Comezy Wage éo.) Fou) F. 2d 7, 795 ~ 9a (2d Coa. qe) a Evans vs. Cucomee no £4GGG i Se, 1, 194950 Uls Crs Ry me \) Fewer V5. TuePEN | SIS US. Ust (1494) » “ Vs. Warnwaratr, 497 ULS 344 (\4pe) 523 LS. AE (43 3) henipacdecy Vean V5. Unaren STATES — . a = Ae »$o¢ : 54 Us Ise (iaas) Feo. Ro cry pl (2 ios PAU Cb) 1) 7 ZALES VS, Céosay SUS Ks, S24, Qe (2e0¢) s) Evgenon Vs. Excdmonsd , Pus. Se. 2015 We. 432494q ar 2 ree Va. Séer. io , 23] ' &) HEewawd0ez V5. Resucts FTA FENG , wae. Gor F.3d 3S4y poe (st ex”. 2ois) @ pe DO An one a CO aa BTN Oona a ' Nov. 92, Do, peed 733 &. App, 10s (ure exe nig) | \ JING VS. Se. CYR., SFB US, WFQ, 12 S$. ex, B27) Dar4 | N. 1S (2ew.) ) Jordan vs. Uveren STRES (Prd wl 294953, Ar \ (0.5.6 Mayse (2a) a) Geno V5. Muwerty , SU US B20 (1947) \) dum vs. Bee Seq Ff Ba 24, 242-43 (Ure cme. 2o\1¢) 2) Wariéana vs. DELw , SN LACS N23 (i4q7) , 44 EF. 34 14-7, Ce.A IF (CERT DEAE) 3) may Vs. CULES | Ger FE. 2A war (C.4.8 14492) (Pee. Cut Edun) lu) MoBiey vs. HEAD, Bol © Bd toqy , Woo ~ tes (C44 Ut aeva) if) NATL Cheer UNTO ADMr) Bay. Gees, i 633 Dur eeu CUT" tre yaqz) | ‘ t) Re Buentvey 1, 18% EF 2d 1,3 (ur! oy 1492) D) Roorseuesr vy. INSVNELE, 252 F. 34 Iai (Deu) 2e2 Fa BY Iu Isa CP 34 Av 14¢ 8) Rucu Vs tameres Re SERCO CNN SARL | SOL U.S 367, 35, (1442). f _ ANTTEO STetes Us. S8aGeceiy Fay U.3. BF4q ((488) Olek Vo Me Dawn | SDq U.S. 473 Cove. 594 US. AT “Ss $l, , S37 K.s, €¢ (ouva) OC) Stew Aer Vs. MArIwEr —Vetineet., 523 Us. 637 (1445) Unesco smares Vs. G2wWY, 1279 F.2.0 323 (D. aw 1198) “UMered Somes vs. eww ) IW F3d $80,553 (2.4 s1aas) 2) UMEVED Sores VS. Macdovnes , NO 97-7247, Iaag ULSD Dar Lexrs 22673 (CAU seer 44) ow & JUMETEO STATES NS. WEECHAMS , GTM +, 2d Sie, 513 \ ' (T48 Jem@. 145-2) uy Waye vs. Toney, SEY €.24 72 (C4 U aga) (Pee cuemam) (DENYZAG Cetxer) 5) WENGER VS. O' Biren; NO. Cd -\\o3 , Zewv .S App Lexrs (sus7 (CA 7 Suwe If, Sood) *) weenee NS. CACeO, 731 F 3) F.2d Dou ;ao7 (4T* cae 14s) DP Wwerrmore VS. Avery , 7q FE. ROD IC}, ASE ko (dD. NEB \49¢) ‘QuotmG® Pae Tvs. Co. Va ~ NACL £; ws es ; Za4 0s (4 Cre