Whether the lower court abused its discretion in dismissing the petitioner's case despite newly discovered evidence of judicial misconduct, violations of federal laws and rules, and potential financial gain by the parties involved

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | The Petitioner Aisha Wright conducted an overall review of my case record and Concluded newly substantial evidence that was not supported by the Administrative Law of preponderance evidence, In the case of Cannon v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., No. 15-20127 (5th Cir. | 1/13/2016), In this Case; After Finding new factual documents of evidence of violation of dereliction of Judicial Judge misconduct with the intend of illegal malpractice of lawyers/ ineffectiveness of counsels knowingly and willfully disregarded and failed to impose the Applicable laws of violations of 28 U.S.C. 453-Oath of justices and judges, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Rule 16, Rule 2.9, U.S.C 455, Rule 60, 59(e), 56,11, 42 USC 2000e, 2 USC code 1311, and cal. R. Ct. Canon 1 and 3 of statutory causes of action of factual elements of legal remedy for a reconsideration of this case for a relief for a summary judgment put aside. to be void, whereas; the lower court abuses its judicial discretion of notwithstanding the Federal Rules by law in contrast, connotes the instrumental use of law as a tool for self-interest to have the petitioner Aisha Wright case to be maliciously and prejudicial dismissed. Note; Whereas the Petitioner raise question did all four parties received some type of financial gain from this case to be dismissed in favor of Respondent? Questions, 1.Since the Lower District Court perjure oneself-interest of “No transcript and No Hearing”, See