Does the law require that due to the Respondent's non-response to Summary Judgment and failure to present before the Court a genuine issue of material fact, the petitioner is therefore entitled to Summary Judgment?

estions) pResenteo -—~ ~—— : fija Wear Re ec eng prey ar fas ling acne tnauin wand Judgment, due Process Vidlebinr, O)b Does not the law require that due +o the Respondent's non-response to Summary 7 dgment and failure to present before the Covt a genuine issue of material fact : petitioner is therefore entitied +0 Summary Judgment 7 , : © EZ) DseS nok The law require that due 40 the Respondent's non-veipance 4o matan +0 vatake sthlence due ta Sentence being void $ unconshhvional the petitioner Sentence : by law must be vacated whive thore is evidence to Support that Sentence is : | Void and imposed unthout Due Process’ of Law ? ; (3) Doce not He law cequire due to the Mespondent’s nan-vesponce to Midlon Fox Relic | Fram void wagment ard PCR Applicarion Febtonor 1< therefore entitled by law +0 have Senkenck vacates and released fram unlawtul Canfinernent whore Senlence imposed wat imposed withad indictment, signed waiver of indict & Lack OF Due Process? | . 8. . : pege A