No. 23-5222
Mustafa Ali v. Jeffrey Minehart, Judge, et al.
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-provisions due-process habeas-corpus pcra-petition post-conviction-relief sentencing-discretion state-court-procedure statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the PCRA Court abused its discretion in failing to convert Petitioner's State Habeas Petition into a PCRA Petition?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED — — . 1. Whether the PCRA Court abused its discretion in failing to convert Petitioner's State Habeas : Petition into aPCRA Petition? oo 2. Whether the Trial Court imposed a sentence greater than the statutory maximum? . 3. Whether Pennsylvania Contitutional Statutes 18 Pa.C.S.§1102 and 42 Pa.C.S.§ 9711 are void : for vagueness? . , oo 4. Whether the. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas has abolished the Writ of Habeas Corpus? . ‘ .
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Mustafa Ali
Mustafa Ali — Petitioner