Whether Appellate Court abused its discretion

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether Appellate Court abused it's disereton by déenmy te Vacate and or Granta Evidentiary hénrine, where Pro sé petitioner Established, And State did Not Cebset that trial counsel wars inetective fis Not disclosings Awy of thé discovety priot te thé Entering ot A plea Agtetméent. Whether Appellate Court abused it's discretion by (ENiEWing A part of the Newly Niseoveted Evidewee / Ritention Filé that Is outside of The teinl CourT fecords, And by not sending bnck te thé Treal Couct So all of the Newly Discovered Evidewc® covld be féevigewed wn A Evidestiary Hearing. LEST oF PARTIES Petitronel, Pro sé a DAMES Seo? . R302 84 : Po. Box looo . Meward Li 62259 . For Respondent Athony Wills >Me. Awame Raoul Attorwey Genecal loow. Randa ph St, 1274 Fleer Chicago TI 6060} , OPINION BELOW The Ordit & the Appellate Court & Tiliwors Ficst Jodiera! bistriet, which was published m 2022 FL App (14) 210097-U, This Ordet was Filed Under Supreme Court Rule 23 And ts wot precedent Except in the limited citcumdinnees Allowed ondet Role 23 G)(:), ts wWeluded herem iv