Why were the defendant indicted and tried at a bench trial in violation of 725 ILCS 5/109-3?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; . (] WHY WHO INDICTED AND TRYED AT AN BENCH TRIAL IN Violation, WITH TS Tics $/109-3.\ (0) (EVERY PERSON ON PRETRIAL ReLense OR Recoqieance fap THe Quedacd Commission of a Feloaiy Shall Person ECEHER A PERIimiNARY EXAMINATION a5 ofvided IN Sections 109-3 OR ON INDICTMENT BY GRAND JUZY as FPRevidet IN SECTION \N-2 WITHIN: 00 DAMS Fitom THe Date He Was AReested 2 TS8ve 1 INERFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL; PROSECUTOR MISCONDUCT ; ABUSE OF COURT DISCRETT OA! . A L INDICTMENT WERRING DOCUMENTATION ON MARCH F TH201 8, SEE.FAS NO. PCOA4O TY Rou eH, i ‘Ss NO» 6O64SS , ; HE ALLEDGED. _. WHY DIO TRIAL CouNSseL. NOT CALL ALL OF THE DEFENDANT WITNESSES To. THE dey Rie BYTIERY OR, INTERVIEW DEFENDANT UIITNESSES UPOM HIS PRE-TR/AL INVESTIGATION? TSSUE.T NEFFECTIVE BSSISTANCE OF Fee COUNSEL». Ry 7ywILO. SEE DS A ENCH IAL REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS OF HEARiWG HAD OA) FEBRUARY ZY TAZOL0, CE. Pg.NO., R102 LINE THROUGH 16, OF BENCH TRIAL. TRMAUSCKIPTION ; AND; KRANKEL HERRING (LVE Aupre ~ VISIUAL COMMUNICATION) REPORT OF FROLEERINGS OF HEARING HerD ON Nove BER IBAZ O13. SEE, PG.NOsnR.1S LINE 12 TRovGH 24 AMD OVER To PG -NOyRIY Lie | THeouGH 2.7? AND} PETITION FOR pesrCONNECTION RELIEF COMMON LAK) RECORDS ON AuGusT /2™ 2021, SEE, 79-NO.,C.I25 CLATM | SUBPARAQRAPH MENTIGN AS “INMATES "AND? CLAIM i SUBPARAGRAPH MENTION As “CORR _OFFICERS OF PONTTAC Corr.CtR,.”;AND, CLAIM | SUBPARAGRAPH MEKITIOA! AS “Menta. HORTH PROFESS tony /DOCT Oe" AND; CLAIM | SECTION B UNDER “EX.| SLAIEFFECTIVE AsstsTpary OF Counser Sf RENCE THAT'S’ UNDISPUTED > {TRIAL COUN SEL SCOTT R-RIPLEY)MNTION LEAERS Davey m6 JUNE 2/57 2013 CENTER, OctaBER Bolg LETER , NOVEMBER 132013 LEER, mAeH 32019 APRIL 22614 LETER, JanvARy 1Stg009 LEME SEE PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF Common LAW RECORDS Obs AUGUST 1274202). Pa, Nol. 126 HAND PETITION FOR POST-CONVICHon ReLlEr Command! LAW RecogDs OM AUGUST 1274202 PINOY C.150 | THROUGH C-IFS SAND 7 C-264 THigUGH C.307 YRGEIT ATIENTIOLZ 70 F9-NG 0, C-27L. THRayey C278. 3.WHY DID WRAL Counsel nor PRESENT ESSENTIAL VIDEO SURVAILLtANCE CAMERA FeoTa¢s THAT WOULD 've Sones ACTS THAT WERE ZN CONSTSTENCE IND, WOULD'VE LAYED) OUT PRopep G6Rounins POR The ZMPEACHMENT OF THE TESTIMONIES OF THE STE WITNESSES AND AULEDGE Victi4g 2 TSsves FETE ‘ASSTSTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL. KRANKEL HEARING Heb ON NOVEMBER I3™*Z0l2, SEE. Pa. NO. P.18 ME 12.7 TO Ta-NO+ Rol LINE | THROVGH 2H AND alla m. NOo, Rp LINE 12 THROUGH 24 fain Ove ae Wee Ling” | THROUGH Z; ANDzPa.NGR.2Y LINE 13 7yeeUGH 24; AND S BRICH TRIAL. ReptIET Oe Proce, MO 2! ON APRIL 292019, SEE. Ph. Alo R 5D LINE 8 TAROVEH 2Y AuiD OVER 10 Da, NO-) BS) LINE 1 77, ING Heir UNE | THROUGH 2Y,AND, OVER 76 Po. NO6-9BR-52 CIE / THROUGH 24 , Akity Hee TO PG. b.. R 5g UGH Wig tia 24 AND OVER 7p P5-Noes gay UNE! THROUGH 24 AND OVER TO F 4. No. 45 se ay JE / Fait OU eae N.» RBly Lie 1 7HiRBLGH 24 AxiD ovER 70 Po, ko UaRG ee, eee ANID OVER -to FaeN0., 2.53 LiNe 1 THROUGH 24 AND OVER 76 Py.NOx £59 tHE Th THROUGH 2 70 PG-NOyBelod “LINE! THROUGH 24 AND OVER To Fy.NG-,Rlol CINE? Tipuey reel Th AND Over +7R-OL Live! THROUGH ZY AnID OVER Ty 4G.N0 58.63 Lint! THewU Ee. ROUCH gH AnD OVER Fo Fy.lp ~ f AEE THROUGH MEL DS BNCN TIM ROLL OF FPROUEEDING HELD OM hinge MEE, Fo tGNO-, RLY ONE IF THROUGH ZT Axio OVER To TG.NG, R70 Lie | SHO “AND OVER ID Py Mn oats cil 69 24 ARO OER 70 79.NO.4 R72 Line’t splaoucd 24 Ano eA! 3 Ayee73 lise Fitcotlal Mittal TROUGH Page NO RY Live | “FHROUGH 24 ALD OVER 70 1. Oop RAS UNE IPTHROUGH 24 bse OO 70 fb. nic, Bony ONE | THRouGH 24 AND OVER To 7-0) RAT) UNE F THROUGH 24 AND OVER TO 49.0, P78 Lge y heowey ALAND overcre Pe : / 2 g.NO-+R.74 LINE I°THROUGH 2H AND . j R.BL LINE | THKouGy 24 AND OVER TO F9.NO.,2,83 LIME pypevee Nos Ree OMe! THROUGH 34 AND WER To Pg. NO, To P4NOsP-85 Lug | THRs 24 Mb OEE Fy-No-, RB OH 2H AND AU, TO 74-NOy RBH LINE | THROUGH 24 ap over? AND OVER “To 79.No-)8.88 LINE 1 THROUGH 24 ALID OVER “To Pg.Nory R.3 U6HRZM AKID OVER 70 By. do., R.8) LINE 1 THROUGH