No. 23-5241

Lenroy McLean v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-law civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment judicial-conflict legal-precedent standing
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether there is a conflict between Kimmelman v Morrison and Ex-Parte Milligan on the Fourth Amendment as a trial right in criminal prosecution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . <1. Whether there is a conflict between Kimmelman v Morrison holding that’ the : Fourth Amendment is not a trial right in criminal prosecution and Ex-Parte Milligan holding that it is ?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Lenroy McLean
Lenroy McLean — Petitioner
Lenroy McLean — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent