Can the Circuit Courts of Appeals treat indigent pro se litigants differently than they treat litigants who can afford attorneys, by just dismissing their cases with a form-letter-style order, used exclusively for indigent pro se litigants, without allowing them an opportunity to present their case, and without any explanation?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) The Ninth Circuit developed an automated system, where it dismisses almost ALL indigent pro se claims without an opportunity to review; 414 cases since 2017 (evidence attached). Can the Circuit Courts of Appeals treat indigent pro se litigants differently than they treat litigants who can afford attorneys, by just dismissing their cases with a form-letter-style order, used exclusively for indigent pro se litigants, without allowing them an opportunity to present their case, and without any explanation? 2) Can a district judge deny a motion for in-forma pauperis on a hunch, without any evidence, based on information from months earlier, even though the indigent litigant provided a signed affidavit attesting to his indigency and provided the evidence requested, and there were no inaccuracies, or is it a violation of Plaintiffs fourteenth amendment rights to due process? . 3) Is a person who was denied an in forma pauperis entitled to an appeal? : . 3 .