Whether counsel's statements are entitled to 'double deference' or a presumption of correctness when such are premised entirely upon a logical fallacy, and whether such is debatable amongst jurists of reason entitling Petitioner to a Certificate of Appealability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 (a) Whether counsel's statements are entitled to "double deference” or a presumption of correctness when such are premised entirely upon a logical fallacy? (b) And whether such is debatable amongst jurists of reason entitling Petitioner to a Certificate of Appealability? 2 Whether it is debatable amongst jurists of reason that the State Court's denial is entitled to deference when Petitioner's inability to prove racial makeup of venire panel was caused by State-created barrier? -i