No. 23-5252

Bruce Lamont Fuller v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-08-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-justice administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review procedural-rules standing
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 Wen Ts OUE PRO , CESS IN “FRANKLIN WEARING °C NERLODKED 2WHY IS CONSTUTIONAL NERIT . NOT APPL CARE WHEN Bue PRacegs IS CLEAR ? 3. HOW CAN THIS CourRT AONMTINISIER SUSTICE TIN VRE “INTEREST oF suste” WISN TRE LOWER” REFUSES TO FLLay THE RULES TT IS ENFORCING ?

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-10-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main DocumentOtherOtherMain DocumentOtherOther
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-22
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2023)
PetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisAppendixProof of ServicePetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Bruce Lamont Fuller
Bruce Lamont Fuller — Petitioner
Bruce Lamont Fuller — Petitioner
California
Brendon W. Marshall — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Brendon W. Marshall — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent