Whether the defendant's plea agreement was invalid, and the defendant's conviction should be vacated, due to the defendant being incarcerated on an unrelated probation violation charge at the time of the plea agreement

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED. t. the detepad ont signs toned Lenel plea Re fee ment Vrob fanteins & PAW SiON: O "Bie fo sushern & conviction of Ihe defendant oCler he Files an oppea of the “uaa. aa / L ie : wie hich he ad in ths mee } Ip other wotd 5, ‘S fy, ot vo fair "e tefce ine J Y . Cdefendeat bo be galey based og 4 plea Fhot became karly Nall and Ueid in thee Case based of ile Swi pieWvigion 7 : Y Severed legdhinake feesens oxrstid Pha perch fhe diladan! 7 acl nie fouls ihe ehid he dt Tose Feave rs clude: OES PRKent bs al eiad Qyethe re uy Me ad ce ‘Give these ata, oe rg php Fee Sek Mm plow g. ° iv dleunstances Sheutd the SUie, and ons od oof ueades of . Lndementol Canoes alte « uothdiaa af af plea, fer the eas Gace eneslirg y : . Re defendant Wag looked up due L, a prceation wralaklcry charge. He IAS Never brouglnt be Lrial Ci No. Probetion Ulolafion, Is it a Structural 2 Cr \ 5 “leat Lo “ny the delendan t Leica Cor the. crime charge) Te f n >Wuchual efrocr tb. ' ; low uo. 7 neo ¢ mn by Te ww fhe defendant ofa chofhe, bake his Ceeclom “A vor hed charge Lo . Or. . ; meee 3 j the 5 Nand wth emendnent of US .Conchbah ) y PD LOANS tad py Me .