No. 23-5262
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rule civil-rule-60(b)(4) court-of-appeals due-process independent-action ninth-circuit original-action standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in failing to address or resolve the 'Foundational Question' presented in an original and independent action under Civil Rule 60(b)(4)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #1: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has entered a decision [Harmon v Houser-Case No.23-14-May 30,2023] that did not address or resolve the "Foundational Question" Presented to the Court in/thru an ORIGINAL an EW_INDEPENDANT ACTION pursuant tovCiv. Rule b0( bY Cd) see
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent State of Alaska to respond filed.
2023-07-25
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2023)
Attorneys
In Re Stephen Harmon
Stephen Harmon — Petitioner
State of Alaska
Nancy Robin Simel — Office of Criminal Appeals, Respondent