No. 23-5274
Wicahpe George Milk v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1503 attorney-client-privilege constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure dismissal indian-reservation jurisdiction statutory-interpretation suppression
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether acts occurring on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation deprived the Court of jurisdiction over all parts of the indictment
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether acts occurring on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation deprived the Court of jurisdiction over all parts of the indictment. I. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1503 is unconstitutional and could not have formed the basis for any conviction. II. Whether the seizure of attorney client material from defendant’s jail cell should have been suppressed and resulted in the dismissal of all counts against him. i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2023)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wicahpe Milk
Terry L Pechota — Pechota Law Office, Petitioner
Terry L Pechota — Pechota Law Office, Petitioner