Whether the District Court's decision was an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the District Courts' of COA was an unreasonable : application of clearly established federal law? 2. Whether the District Court erred in denying whether a reasonable jurist could find this COA debatable amongst reasonable jurists; an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court law? 3. Whether the District Courts justice erred in denying whether or not to issue a certificate of appealability; an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court law? 4. Whether the Court violated Petitioner's Constitutional Rights by allowing the admission of DNA evidence without a proper chain of custody occurring; was an unreasonable application of facts and law? 5. Whether..the Court erred by allowing contaminating evidence to be used; was an unreasonably application of clearly established Supreme Court law? . 6. Whether the Court erred by. allowing the prosecutor to instruct jurors to not hunt for Reasonable Doubt; an unreasonable. application of clearly established Federal Supreme Court law? ~ 7. Whether the Court erred in allowing Hearsay Evidence to be entered, and whether Defense Counsel rendered Ineffective Assistance by failing to object to such evidence. . . 8