No. 23-5285
Asmerom Gebreselassie v. Gigi Matteson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability conflict-of-interest court-of-appeals docket-entry ninth-circuit procedural-history retained-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment unreasonable-determination-of-fact
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in failing to grant a certificate of appealability?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Err In Failing To Grant A Certificate Of Appealability When It Denied Petitioner's Motion ; For Certificate Of Appealability Based On A Wrong Docket, DOCKET ENTRY No. 15, Which Was Not Petitioner's Motion For Certificate _ Of Appealability? .2. Did The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Err In Failing To Grant A Certificate Of Appealability On Petitioner's Claim Of The Violation Of His Sixth Amendment Right To The Retained Counsel Of Choice That Was Unreasonably Rejected By The California Court Of Appeal? i .
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Gigi Matteson, Warden to respond filed.
2023-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Scott Frauenheim, Warden
Jill M. Thayer — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Jill M. Thayer — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent