No. 23-5288

Jay Hymas v. Department of the Interior, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-08-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege case-disposition civil-procedure constitutional-law federal-appellate-rules judicial-review ninth-circuit ninth-circuit-court-of-appeals procedural-standards
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion overcomes the Federal Appellate Rules regarding the disposition of a case, and if so whether the principles of that opinion can be violated in dismissing a case by asserting that claims of violation of the attorney-client privilege are 'insubstantial'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion, United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 1982, overcomes the Federal Appellate Rules regarding the disposition of a case, and if so whether the principles of that very opinion can be violated in dismissing a case by asserting that claims of violation of the attorney-client privilege are “insubstantial”.

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent Interior Department, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Interior Department, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Jay Hymas
Jay Hymas — Petitioner