No. 23-5292
Carlos Arturo Patino Restrepo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy constructive-amendment criminal-procedure due-process indictment jury-instructions prosecutorial-discretion
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's conspiracy instructions that remove any mention of a specific group from the overall conspiratorial agreement constitute a constructive amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where an indictment alleges a conspiracy involving a specific group, does a district court's conspiracy instructions which removes any mention of the group from the overall conspiratorial agreement constitute a constructive amendment?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Carlos Arturo Restrepo
Carlos Arturo Patino Restrepo — Petitioner
Carlos Arturo Patino Restrepo — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent