Do the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments confer a right to a jury trial with respect to a fact that has the dual effect of (1) increasing the mandatory minimum sentence on an individual criminal count and (2) requiring the sentence on that count to be imposed consecutively?

Questions Presented 1. Do the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments confer a right to a jury trial with respect to a fact that has the dual effect of (1) increasing the mandatory minimum sentence on an individual criminal count and (2) requiring the sentence on that count to be imposed consecutively? 2. In a trial of charges of child molestation, does it deny Fourteenth Amendment due process to admit the testimony of an expert witness that false allegations of child molest are rare? 8. Does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment for a judge to apply an incorrect legal standard to making a finding that increases the mandatory minimum sentence? 4. Is the record sufficient to support a judge’s finding that each crime of which a jury convicted a defendant occurred on a “separate occasion” where (1) the witness described many criminal acts, some occurring on the same occasion as others, some occurring on separate occasions, but (2) the jury found that only a few of these acts had been proved, and (8) the jury did not specify which acts were the basis for its guilty verdicts?