Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the First Amendment's free speech protections

No question identified. : ae 4 om THE PETITIONER PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS “The Petitioner respectfully asks” 1. Concerning Exculpatory Evidence: Should Mr. Ramos’ convictions be set aside under Brady, withheld exculpatory evidence which led to the due process violation under the 14 Amendment and the illegal actions of the prosecution? 2. Concerning Jury Misconduct: Should Mr. Ramos’ convictions be set aside under Title 22 O.S. § 952 Grounds for a New Trial if in an Evidentiary Hearing there are reliable witnesses and Sworn Affidavits to confirm the juror’s misconduct and the 5‘ and 14 Amendments? 3. Concerning Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Should Mr. Ramos’ conviction be set aside due to the violation of the 6‘ Amendment due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prejudice for the excessive sentence.