Did the federal courts of appeals err in rejecting petitioner's claims of due process and equal protection violations?

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED, 1. DID THE EAANEFED 8107S CONT OF APYEACs DELVE Pal Mtl RIN FEBEI. EVE 6 OM jl A WHY TU! Colic WHY A DELON BY A DHEED B0tzeS Coke of nMenie f Zz, ” TE WED SHES COUT 0 APPEAL. SO FAR DERE FRO WE NCCE UIVAL COURSE OF OUDIGAL Beep UES 48 1p CHLL-IBR EXERCISE OF HS COUNTS SUPZVAY wens ? ° ve | 3.910 THE CUED Stuns DiNCr CUk7 BBOSEO +78 bisckétion! BY FATLWE 40 EXCKUSE175 DISC CON 7 LONSIDER GE ME ID CONS IR AALD ALMEUAL. PAE. AWW. COMMELING EVIDENCE, BLENE 11 SUMMURLY ACEP THER ER AND ENTCRING 6 FINAL SuRGmMena Fo 1 DID re vit Srares Di COM NBD 175 VISCO BYATAEROPERLY Tae TODIGAL Nin cé of UHRELA TP LASEE AS MBSE, Mal WHE OUTS IDE py “ONGMIIL PLEADING, Thar Coury REMoALBLY GE SvETET TOY DISTR EVIDqItEAY prite,? _ ee ae . aE, OS CLUISTOF PARTIES = sss—S ; [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ue All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all