No. 23-5308

James Renwick Manship v. Susan Beals, Commissioner

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2023-08-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights election-integrity electronic-voting first-amendment free-speech grand-jury petition petition-rights voting-machines voting-rights
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED RELATED TO FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF HONEST VOTE (FREE SPEECH) & PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES TO A GRAND JURY

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED related to FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS of HONEST VOTE (FREE SPEECH) & PETITION for REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES to a GRAND JURY 1) Isan Election Expedited Injunction warranted to stop the ELECT (Virginia Department of Elections, and similar agencies in other States), in State or Federal Elections, from using Electronic Voting Machines, repeatedly revealed by experts to be flawed and vulnerable? 2) May a Citizen present facts to a Grand Jury, instead of Attorney General investigators biased for their ELECT Defendant clients, or in other agencies, to verify Virginia law and Federal policies were thoroughly, and honestly completed to “Certify” Electronic Voting Machines? 3) Does the 1796 “Innovation” of the Unit Rule Plan that cost Jefferson 4 Electors in NY so he would have won 72 to 67, so the “Winner Take All” plan overturns or corrupts the Framers’ Vision of District based Popular Vote Presidential ELECTOR appointment plan of Delegate James Wilson of 2 June 1787, so to invisibly enable and encourage Political Party Power Brokers to Steal Elections, in one or a few Precincts in one or more Counties so to obtain all the State’s Electoral Votes, in today’s world using Electronic Vote count systems, thereby disenfranchising minority voters in rural Districts from their First Amendment Free Speech Right to Vote for President? FLEET TEFL TAFETEFEEA ET EEEP

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-22
Waiver of right of respondent Susan Beals to respond filed.
2023-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)

Attorneys

James Manship
James Renwick Manship — Petitioner
James Renwick Manship — Petitioner
Susan Beals
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent