No. 23-531

Timothy I. Carpenter v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure drug-offense federal-firearm-offense first-step-act mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimums retroactivity sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the sentencing reforms in Section 403 of the First Step Act apply when a district court sentences an individual whose offense was committed before the Act's effective date but whose initial sentence was vacated afterwards?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Two provisions of the First Step Act (Sections 401 and 403) significantly reduce mandatory minimum sentences for certain federal firearm and drug offenses. First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, §§ 401, 403, 132 Stat. 5194, 5220-22 (FSA). These reduced minimums apply to all offenses committed after December 21, 2018, the Act’s date of enactment. As relevant here, they also apply to “any offense that was committed before the date of enactment of this Act, if a sentence for the offense has not been imposed as of such date of enactment.” FSA §§ 401(c), 403(b). The question presented here is: Do the sentencing reforms in Section 403 of the First Step Act apply when a district court sentences an individual whose offense was committed before the Act’s effective date but whose initial sentence was vacated afterwards?

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-02
Letter from counsel for petitioner calling the Court's attention to a recent Fifth Circuit decision filed.(Distributed)
2024-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-31
2024-01-26
Letter from the Solicitor General filed.
2024-01-17
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-12-18
2023-12-18
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2023-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2024.
2023-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 18, 2023 to January 17, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)

Attorneys

American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, Cato Institute, and Due Process Institute
Emma Anamaria AnderssonAmerican Civil Liberties Union, Amicus
Emma Anamaria AnderssonAmerican Civil Liberties Union, Amicus
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Kevin James PoloncarzCovington & Burling LLP, Amicus
Kevin James PoloncarzCovington & Burling LLP, Amicus
Timothy Carpenter
Jeffrey L. FisherStanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Petitioner
Jeffrey L. FisherStanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent