Did the trial court and/or the prosecution violate the Sixth Amendment confrontation-clause and clearly-established-law by concealing the location of the only material witness and preventing her from testifying

QUESTION(s) PRESENTED 1. Mr. Redfearn respectfully asks: Did the trial court and/or the prosecution violate the Sixth (6) Amendment, [confrontation clause], and clearly established law of the United States Supreme Court, by concealing the location of the only material witness! and preventing her from testifying in trial? 2. Mr. Redfearn respectfully asks: Did the State violate the United States Constitution by exposing the jury to incomplete preliminary hearing transcripts in the trial? 3. Mr. Redfearn respectfully asks: Did the Assistant District Attorney violate Mr. Redfearn’s Civil Rights, [42 U.S.C.A., Ch. 21. § 1983], by obstructing his defense and preventing the only witness(es) who could identify him, from testifying in a criminal trial? ' This is the witness who made the allegation(s) against Mr. Redfearn. More so when the witness called the District Attorney’s Office and demanded to testify in the trial, but the prosecutor ensure she was not present. (See Trial Transcripts of voice mail prosecution played in open court) i