No. 23-5317
Aaron J. Bressi v. Jeffery Brennen, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion case-dismissal civil-procedure court-procedure due-process failure-to-state-a-claim failure-to-state-claim judicial-discretion legal-review procedural-dismissal public-interest standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How does this Complaint get dismissed by Both the Honorable District Court and the Honorable Appeals Court, for Failure to State a Claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |, How coes this Complaint get dismissed by Both the Honorable District Court and the Honorable Appeals Court, for Failure te State a Claim. 2. How is this Case not Considered that both the Honorable District Courty and +he Honorable Appeals Courts did abused their discretion throughout this entire Case3. How Can this Very Serious ‘ssue not be Considered te he Importance +o the public of the \ssuUe
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-31
Waiver of right of respondent Jeffery Brennen, et al. to respond filed.
2023-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeffery Brennen, et al.
Kimberly A. Boyer-Cohen — Marshall Dennehey, P.C. , Respondent
Kimberly A. Boyer-Cohen — Marshall Dennehey, P.C. , Respondent