No. 23-5318
Aaron J. Bressi v. John Gembic, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion case-dismissal civil-procedure complaint-dismissal court-procedure due-process failure-to-state-claim judicial-discretion jurisdiction legal-review public-interest standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How does this Complaint get dismissed by Both the Honorable District Court, and the Honorable Appeals Court, Sor failure To State a Claim
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. How does this Complaint get dismissed by Both the Honorable District Court, and the Honorable Appeals Court, Sor failure To State a Claim. 2. How Is this Case not Considered that both +he Honorable District Courts and +he Honorable Appeals Court, did abused their discretion throughout +his entire Case3. How Can this Very Serious issue not be Considered to be Imper tance +o the public of the |ssuUe
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-08-24
Waiver of right of respondents Michael Toomey, Peter Kay and Vinny Clausi to respond filed.
2023-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael Toomey, Peter Kay and Vinny Clausi
Christine Elizabeth Munion — William J. Ferren and Associates, Respondent
Christine Elizabeth Munion — William J. Ferren and Associates, Respondent