No. 23-5331

Al Douglas Wordly v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-08-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus procedural-default residual-clause statutory-interpretation vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), establishes 'cause' to excuse procedurally defaulted 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims that are predicated on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(B)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), establishes “cause” to excuse procedurally defaulted 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims that are predicated on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(B). i

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service
2023-11-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 7, 2023.
2023-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 17, 2023 to December 7, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-10-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 17, 2023.
2023-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2023 to November 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-09-18
Response Requested. (Due October 18, 2023)
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 11, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendixProof of ServiceOtherMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Al Wordly
Anshu Suresh Budhrani — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Anshu Suresh Budhrani — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kirsten R. Nelson — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kirsten R. Nelson — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent