Did the trial court err in applying the felony murder rule and submitting an incomplete jury verdict that violated the defendant's due process rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED _ did the State fail to prove beyound a reasonable doubt. Why did the US District Court Judge R. Goodman issue an order barring Mr. Walker from using STATE V HEEMSTRA, for this Issue, before Habeas Breifs were even submitted and filed in this Court violating Due Process? 4) Susan Carter and Eric Tyrell were both called as witnesses for the State. Yet only one of them, Namely ERic Tyrell was certified by the Court as an Expert witness based upon his education and experiance on cell phone towers. They both testified as to the location of MR. Walker and where his cell phone pinged at. Susan Carter testified to a location, yet was unsure and not factual on her assessment. SHe worked for Qwest, but in the fraud department. NOT engineering or tower operations. She testified to locations that were not supported by evidence. with no experiance she lacked the education to make that determination. ANd she was not an expert witness, and Defense should have objected. County Attorney Wolf corrected her testimony while Tyrell testified, Stating that her statements were false and not supported by the evidence. Therefore perjuring himself on record and violated ethical procedures as an officer of the Court. Committing procecuter ‘ misconduct. Eric Tyrell testified to a broader spectrum as to how towers and cell phones work, when determining a location. HE went on to say that, "Cell phone towers may list a city or town, but that the person can be a hundread miles away in any directions from the city or town. (See; Writ, Petition Pgs. 13,14,15). IS his expert opinon a direct location can not be determined within 100 miles. THe expert in this case holds more of a determination then Ms. Carter who testified based on what she thought, not based upon scientific evidence, nor did she know how to properly interprate it. Why did defense Attorney Dalton not object to Susan Carters testimony as speculation and hearsay? : Why did the Court not hold Attorney Wolf in contempt or accountable for misleading the Jury and the COurt? . -2 ; “QUESTIONS PRESENTED ' 5) When agent Reger investigated the times of the Hotel where MAurice Walker stayed at. He testified to a print out from the Hotel that listed the approximate times of Walker coming in and leaving the Hotel. In Order for a print-out or list of times that | were submitted to Agent Reger to make sense. A couple things or | terms need to be meet. That the card room reader at the hotel needs : to have been caulibrated with in the last year. And anyone entering that room would record a time and date. whether it was a maids Master key or a Manager's key. The Key cards would not register an individual card. Therfore the times on the Hotel print-out of times could be off my hours or minutes and can not determine if it was MR. Walker coming in or not. The proper date and time and time zone must be entered in the Key card reader. Agent Reger even said that there were 2-3 different sets of times, and REger was undetermined as to the Correct date/time listed. HE Stated "That he was not sure". — without a definite testimony with certainty this issue, Would not it create reasonable doubt to the Court and the Jury? (SEE: WRIT, PG.S. 15A, 15B) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: MAURICE WALKER. LIST OF PA