Whether an argument for a sentence based on specific statutory sentencing factors is sufficient to preserve a procedural reasonableness claim

QUESTION PRESENTED To determine whether a sentencing issue is preserved, “The question is simply whether the claimed error was ‘brought to the court’s attention.” HolguinHernandez v. United States, 140 8. Ct. 762, 767 (2020) (quoting Fed. R. Crim. Pro 52(b)). As a result, a defendant preserves a substantive reasonableness claim by advocating for a particular sentence. Id. at 766. This case presents the next logical question: Is an argument for a sentence based on specific statutory sentencing factors sufficient to preserve a procedural reasonableness claim? Because the divide among the circuit courts on this question has firmly remained after Holguin-Hernandez, this Court should grant certiorari and resolve the issue. prefix PARTIES,