Is it a constitutional Fifth and Sixth Amendment violation when during voir dire and motivated by a single juror's racial identity, Counsel of Record intentionally withholds knowledge of damaging information from defendant that justifies a juror's removal for cause and deliberately refrains from asking juror any questions to satisfy his own strategy decision?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is it a constitutional Fifth and Sixth Amendment violation : when during voir diré and motivated by a single juror's racial identity, Counsel of Record intentionally withholds = knowledge of damaging information from defendant that justifies a jucor's removal for cause and deliberately refrains from asking juror any questions to satisfy his own strategy decision? . 2. Is it a constitutional Fifth and $#xth Amendment violation when during voir dire and motivated by a single juror's racial identity, Counsel of Record intentionally withholds knowledge of damaging information from a sidebar meeting with the court, prosecution, and juror that would cause an instant removal by the court to satisfy his own strategy decision? | ve ° oe et . LISTOF PARTIES . L. parties appear in the caption of the case’on the cover pagé. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all