1. Is it a constitutional Fifth and Sixth Amendment violation
when during voir dire and motivated by a single juror's racial identity, Counsel of Record intentionally withholds
knowledge of damaging information from defendant that
justifies a jucor's removal for cause and deliberately
refrains from asking juror any questions to satisfy his own
strategy decision?

2. Is it a constitutional Fifth and Sjj'xth Amendment violation
when during voir dire and motivated by a single juror's
racial identity,, Counsel of Record intentionally withholds
knowledge of damaging information from a sidebar meeting
with the court, prosecution, and juror that would cause an
instant removal by the court to satisfy his own strategy
decision?

Is it a constitutional Fifth and Sixth Amendment violation when during voir dire and motivated by a single juror's racial identity, Counsel of Record intentionally withholds knowledge of damaging information from defendant that justifies a juror's removal for cause and deliberately refrains from asking juror any questions to satisfy his own strategy decision?