Did the courts err in upholding the identification of the petitioner as the perpetrator of the crime

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) | Did We Courds Lalo art UPhncldia®S Ariel Cour, Uther Comenoaiitaltn Padad Yo ckeblishs dhe idenbbicadioo . AY A QA Avwrr 05 Vo QiVartater { ; | hots the PodibreatrS Comichore SvuGtaad \holadion af ait\\ aetolreSaned Louss 66 Lsll 06 Cond vhorsl TRuiremant ambsedad wo tin aati hannadon oor Preshactior aon oul No dat di and thes ' GPP \ calla to Sho Shoda Aheowdh dhe Fourhosath Amindount +o Afar Wadd Nodes Contdiuhon 2 Did Aho oPPotlate Course arr tbl uPholdin® dla deel Court's Chosion OF Gitdicl Sion dhe Pod drone daar 4a Fach ond Qlaeninia Winte Para Cloead Veaen loan Fo \didotedd vsntt dhods dona Se ? Oid Aha Coumls toolast Comont! bausrsalole cand or \aSal treet Comathod MW Prichen at at Prepress ac and USo of Pioarny wm Commmetnon of murder Udnic such Charde oP RenSa sos Noli Protasend bY otal OAreeMant lates loci varhadand Did dha ofPalleda Cours Commits Tiurrdelolt ore in Vroletien of | No. uP 4. Rule SAAB, A pafuein’ ravardal oF Debconar’s _ Comtithorts udhare deal Couccel wee Ao Vr hoaar Ad Sew tact Cio LooMe \odal autlror dy ab Calladaral a APA sT26 AGdiota, ; and Cela Aastheds oS Gaal 6S pnad Lo Priceot dhe ablechon doalY woth Sulficiak Parbiculard4d ba wes Iindadid &Y Ana Noclda Pracnd ? , |