No. 23-5361

Andrew Slabon v. Angelo R. Sanchez, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-08-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech jury-trial procedural-rules seventh-amendment standing state-action trial-by-jury
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Seventh Amendment's fundamental right to a trial by jury is violated when meritorious complaints are dismissed based on monetary policies and/or local rules

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : t Whether the original intent of the founders of the United States Constitution allowed for the appli| cation of local rules, which were carefully crafted to apply specifically to individual states or districts, such as the state of Illinois, considered one of the most corrupt states in America, to — } infringe upon the fundamental right to a jury trial as secured by the seventh amendment of oe the United States Constitution and to deny the citizens the right to be secure in their homes, . protecting them from unwarranted and unjustified seizures by the state and force medical : : procedures by state-run medical industries? ; , . | . ; i : U.

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent Presence Our Lady of Resurrection Medical Center to respond filed.
2023-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent Angelo R. Sanchez, et al. to respond filed.
2023-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2023)

Attorneys

Andrew Slabon
Andrew Slabon — Petitioner
Andrew Slabon — Petitioner
Angelo R. Sanchez, et al.
Myriam Zreczny KasperCity of Chicago Department of Law, Respondent
Myriam Zreczny KasperCity of Chicago Department of Law, Respondent
Presence Our Lady of Resurrection Medical Center
Patrick Michael CreaghCassiday Schade LLP, Respondent
Patrick Michael CreaghCassiday Schade LLP, Respondent