No. 23-5370

Charles Alan Dyer v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2023-08-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights due-process legal-research lewis-v-casey post-conviction-appeal pro-se-prisoner procedural-bar procedural-bars
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-10-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state can place procedural bars on a pro se prisoner's initial post-conviction appeal after denying the prisoner access to legal research facilities in violation of Lewis v. Casey

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED ) _ After a state has violated Lewis v. Casey by actively denying access to legal research facilities to a pro se prisoner on an initial post-conviction appeal, should the state then be allowed to place | | state procedural bars on the inmate for failure to present a claim on this initial appeal? Can the | state place this procedural bar without first analyzing the Lewis vs. Casey denial? a | 5 , a @ @

Docket Entries

2023-10-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2023)

Attorneys

Charles A. Dyer
Charles Alan Dyer — Petitioner
Charles Alan Dyer — Petitioner