whether-nh-supreme-court-should-allow-nh-district-court-judge-to-prosecute-cases

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , ; 1. Whether the NH Supreme Court should allow a NH district court judge to prosecute cases from. the bench; as a former Conway prosecutor, while using active police officers as prosecutors at trial when NH requires all attorneys acting before the NH courts be NH licensed attorneys in the state with further requirements that attorneys licensed in other states be shadowed by a NH licensed attorney before the tribunal. ; . ; : 2. Whether a defendant receives a fair trial, while prosecuted by an active police officer at trial, with no license to practice law in the state after receiving a citation fromn the same police department the, . prosecuting police officer works in within the city when the complainant and witness is the City Mayor. 3. Whether the NH Supreme Court erred in determining harmless error. : 4. Whether the NH Supreme Court erred in failing to strike Berlin NH Ordinance Section 13-4. 5. Whether the two (2) police officers issuing the citation violated state law RSA 105-D:2. 6. Whether defendant’s privacy rights were violated by being videotaped on her private property twice without required Notice by the initial police officer as mandated by RSA 105-D:2. 7. Whether Police Officer Joshua White violated RSA 105-D:2 when he knowingly and admittedly failed to notify Defendant she was being recorded via police body camera on two separatee occasions. Raised and preserved for appeal via Court Hearing dated 04/28/2022. Police Narrative Admission. Plain Error Issue. Hearing, p.5 §19-23. Trial, p. 40, §6-11. Trial, p. 49, §10-23. . . 8. Whether the NH courts erred in failing to issue an arrest warrant for Berlin Police Officer Joshua White for ; RSA 105-D:2 violations. Raised and preserved for appeal via Hearing dated 04/28/2022. Plain Error Issue. 9. Whether the NH Supreme Court erred in failing to reverse the case due to Police Misconduct of RSA 105-D:2. violations. : , ; 10. Whether the NH Supreme Court erred in allowing body camera photographs as evidence against Defendant in : this case upon appellate review. 11. Whether the NH Supreme Court erred in failing to review Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Due to Police Violation of Law, dated 06/06/22. Raised and preserved for appeal via Hearing dated 04/28/22. Raised and preserved for appeal via filed Motion to Dismiss Dué to Police Violation of Law, dated 06/06/22. Plain Error Issue. Trial, p. 47, §1-5. . : 12. Whether the NH Supreme Court erred in failing to address the police admission raised by Motion in Response : to Plaintiff Objection, dated 06/10/22, to be discussed at trial as defense. The Motion was not denied by the Court. ; The Court stated, “Defendant shall not file any othe? pleadings prior to trial where she may present her defense.” ° The Court refused to allow Defendant the right to address the issue at trial. The issue is a full Admission by . police. Plain Error Issue. Trial, p. 47, §11-25. 13. Whether the NH-Supreme Court erred in refusing to address the issues raised by Motion for Reconsideration my to Strike Berlin Ordinance Section 13-4, dated 06/17/22, to be discussed at trial as defense. The Motion was not denied by the Court. The Court stated, “Defendant shall file no further pleadings prior to trial.” The Court refused : to allow Defendant the right to address the issue at trial. Plain Error Issue. Hearing p.4, §12-13. Trial, p. 47, §1125, . ; _ Page 1 of 10 : .