No. 23-5372
Larry David Davis v. Amy Jackson Douglas, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-jurisdiction police-misconduct statutory-interpretation trial-procedure
Latest Conference:
2023-10-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-a-public-defender-has-an-ethical-duty-to-investigate-and-challenge-the-prosecution's-case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LL, Lethe lit CTCUMES BE “a BLE. | Cole of Hate laut bor astiveng refiansibidty | J. | J nnn : Delta Unit Legal Use Only ate STlaye) TREE NED tll Gee Jeinction and Carsallde Cte Ahys relict £254 Habeas Lotms “ase tl fl&eilitas Lingerpiating and investpation inside LalseP 4 dihether a_piblie dander tithe ath in Lontelt Litttethe _ptesecittens in dewiving a detendant at his felted , e 7; : WA . 4 toy Ly the investigating police Aiteel aad ines tgated Lei lack g v OA . g
Docket Entries
2023-10-16
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Larry D. Davis
Larry David Davis — Petitioner