Whether the Third District Court of Appeal and Florida Supreme Court violated the laws governing the separation of power by creating an unwritten ex post facto law giving judicial courts unlimited jurisdiction to impose the sexual predator designation contrary to the expressed statute of limitations in Florida Statute § 775.21(5)(a)2, in violation of the petitioner's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments constitutional rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED IL WHETHER THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL AND FLORIDA SUPREME COURT VIOLATED THE LAWS GOVERNING THE SEPARATION OF POWER BY CREATING AN UNWRITTEN EX POST FACTO LAW GIVING JUDICIAL COURTS UNLIMITED JURISDICTION TO IMPOSE THE SEXUAL PREDATOR DESIGNATION CONTRARY TO THE EXPRESSED STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN FLORIDA STATUTE § 775.21(5)(A)2. IN VIOLATION OF THE PETITIONER’S FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS oo, | 1 |