Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

No question identified. : oO. a 4, WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITS DECISION VIOLATES a PRINCIPLES OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS By HAVING _|__ GREAT PUBLIC TM PORTANCE™ BASED UPON ore SE __ PIEADING TT, SUA SPONTE DVE,ANDZA LEARLY ERRONEOUS eEfeeSEN TAT ri Chui «| MATERIAL FACTS BYTHE LoweR COURT 2 2 WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERREDIN FINDING THAT A PRO SE PRISONER ABANDONED AN TSSUE THAT WAS SUBJECT Jo DE NOVO. REVIEW, WHERE THE PROSE PRISONER ADOP; TED, INCORPORATED AND REALLEGED TNTO HIS INITIAL BRIEF __ CO) | THE ARBUMENTS BELUW BECAUSE THE PRISON LAW LIBRAR _ | LOST HHS ARKUMENT DUKING THE WORD PROCESSING OFTHE ee —GRLEE ABs MoVING. FOR AN EXTENSION OHME WAS NOT AN —___ 7 _OPTION( _ Q the hundteds of millions oF ts Mortugaes_and the interpredytion ee hatlenged here: autonly aaveffely artecr ine mortgagors tha fe. struggling [f.e., those that are 31 days of mote _late on A their mer) raship Const. crahon, | | iT OQ |