No. 23-5381
David Lamar Harper v. William Patrick Adams, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 42-U.S.C-1983 42-usc-1983 case-law civil-rights government-immunity heck-v-humphrey Huphrey-v-Heck-512-U.S.-447-(1994) statute-of-limitations void-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How can a 42 U.S.C 1983 lawsuit, based on a void judgment, be barred by a statute-of-limitations, Huphrey-v-Heck-512-U.S.-447-(1994), and government-immunity when it is not permitted by law or case-law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED How can a 42 U.S.C 1983 lawsuit, based on a void judgment, be barred by a , statue of limitations, Huphrey v. Heck, 512 U.S. 447 (1994), and government immunity when it is not permitted by law or case law?
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-06
Petitioner complied with order of October 16, 2023.
2023-10-16
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 6, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent William Patrick Adams, et al. to respond filed.
2023-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
William Patrick Adams, et al.
Spencer D. Woody — James Bates Brannan Groover, Respondent
Spencer D. Woody — James Bates Brannan Groover, Respondent