No. 23-5384
Wayne Lee Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review attorney-withdrawal civil-procedure court-discretion due-process judicial-process legal-petition merits-review procedural-issue supreme-court writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court should have allowed counsel to withdraw from petitioner's appeal, knowing the petitioner had issues of merit for an appeal on the appeal level that was presented to the court of appeals
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Wwhethec the Lower Couct should have allowed counse | to withdraw | Leom Petitioners A peal, Kaowing the Petitioner had issues of merit for an Appes| mw his fepeal Bevel, that was plese to the Covct of Agpeels.
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent