No. 23-5388
Clifton Lyles v. South Carolina
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-review due-process habeas-corpus legal-precedent post-conviction-relief procedural-bar state-court-decisions state-court-procedure statutory-interpretation subsequent-application
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McHam v. State, 404 S.C. 465, 746 S.E.2d 41 (2013), requires that the petitioner be allowed to file a subsequent PCR application
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DOES McHAM V. STATE,404 S.C. 465,746 S.E.2d 41(2013), REQUIRE THAT PETITIONER BE ALLOWED TO FILE A SUBSEQUENT PCR APPLICATION? 12 feges
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina to respond filed.
2023-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
South Carolina
Mark Reynolds Farthing — S.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Mark Reynolds Farthing — S.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent